ACLU slams emergency crime bill
On Tuesday, June 16th, the DC Council is expected to vote on “emergency” crime bills, including a proposal by Councilman Evans. DC Council should oppose the Evans bill because it will not increase public safety as the proposal:
- Casts a broad and wide net that will sweep many people – including people who have not been involved in a crime – into the criminal justice system;
- Proposes new gun crimes and provisions that are not targeted at reducing gun violence;
- Adds unnecessary new mandatory minimum sentences and makes it easier to detain people pending trial – proposals which will unnecessarily increase incarceration of District residents;
- May brand as gang members law-abiding District residents simply on the basis of guilt by association and PERMANENTLY restrict who they can talk to or associate with in their neighborhoods through "gang injunctions.”
News Channel 4 reports here. News Channel 8 reports here.
For more information, contact Kenny Barnes of ROOT at kennysr@rootinc.org; Johnny Barnes of ACLU/NCA at johnny.barnes@aclu-nca.org; Laura Hankins of the Public Defender Service at lhankins@pdsdc.org; or Liz Ryan of the Campaign for Youth Justice at lryan@cfyj.org.
Update: The Evans gang-injunction language, which was made into an amendment to the Mendelson crime bill, has been defeated on a 4-to-9 vote, with the yes votes belonging to Councilmembers Evans, Graham, Bowser and Catania. Gray and Cheh spoke strongly against the gang-injunction provision. Evans withdrew his own bill, and did not look happy.
Subscribe
Comments