Contact Us

Have a suggestion for an item? Send it along using our contact page.

Enter your email address to join the GLAA Announcements list

DC Gay Etc

About GLAA Forum

GLAA is pleased to offer an online site for discussion of affairs that affect the quality of life of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities of the District of Columbia. Through this social networking media GLAA aspires to connect to new generations of LGBT advocates and straight allies and to strengthen our organization's abilities to communicate and broadcast to a broad and diverse population.

We warmly invite you to join us at our regularly scheduled membership meetings, held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month. Please visit for a list of meeting dates and locations and other important information regarding our group's mission and projects.

Support GLAA

GLAA is an all volunteer organisation. Our expenses are paid by our yearly Awards Banquet and by membership dues and contributions. If you would like to join GLAA this can be done through PayPal or through our membership form.

« Media Matters: Why does WaPo keep running fluffy profiles of anti-gay activists? | Main | L.A. Times: D.C. Council is right »

November 19, 2009

Correcting WaPo on the Catholic Church's opposition to marriage equality

The Washington Post today publishes my response for GLAA to the Post's editorial last Sunday that included the howlingly false statement that the Catholic Church was not opposing marriage equality:

I take issue with The Post's Nov. 15 editorial "Marital discord," especially its claim that "the Catholic Church is not trying to prevent the legalization of same-sex marriage in the District." In fact, the Archdiocese of Washington testified against the marriage equality bill and has supported an initiative that would bar same-sex marriages....

The Post talks about self-righteous D.C. Council members while ignoring the self-righteous intransigence of the archdiocese. The marriage bill protects the church's right to discriminate in its core religious functions, but the church insists on discriminating even in the provision of publicly funded services....

The archdiocese does not pretend that providing benefits to divorced and remarried employees violates its teachings against divorce and remarriage. This is not about forcing religious entities to violate their doctrines but about an organization throwing its weight around out of a sense of entitlement to discriminate. District legislators cannot be expected to submit to blackmail, nor should The Post be making ill-supported excuses for it.

The editors chose the rather odd title, "Marriage counseling for D.C. and the Catholic Church," and insisted on changing my opening "We" to "I," even though I was speaking for GLAA and not just myself; but they did show my title and organizational affiliation below my name. Thanks to Jonathan Capehart for helping ensure that GLAA's response was published.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.