Contact Us

Have a suggestion for an item? Send it along using our contact page.

Enter your email address to join the GLAA Announcements list

DC Gay Etc

About GLAA Forum

GLAA is pleased to offer an online site for discussion of affairs that affect the quality of life of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities of the District of Columbia. Through this social networking media GLAA aspires to connect to new generations of LGBT advocates and straight allies and to strengthen our organization's abilities to communicate and broadcast to a broad and diverse population.

We warmly invite you to join us at our regularly scheduled membership meetings, held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of each month. Please visit www.glaa.org for a list of meeting dates and locations and other important information regarding our group's mission and projects.

Support GLAA

GLAA is an all volunteer organisation. Our expenses are paid by our yearly Awards Banquet and by membership dues and contributions. If you would like to join GLAA this can be done through PayPal or through our membership form.

« CNN on Catholic Charities vs. DC Gay Rights Supporters | Main | D.C. Police discontinue checkpoint program »

November 18, 2009

MW story on Board of Elections ruling

Metro Weekly reports on this week's ruling by the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics against the proposed "Marriage Initiative of 2009":

"We have considered all of the testimony presented to the Board and understand the desire to place this question on the ballot," said Board Chairman Errol R. Arthur. "However, the laws of the District of Columbia preclude us from allowing this initiative to move forward."

Local activist Bob Summersgill said that action was expected.

"They really had very little leeway," he says of BOEE's decision. "[Nearly] everyone who testified on either side agreed that [the initiative] was to increase discrimination against gay people."

Summersgill said the decision would likely be "very quickly appealed by Rev. Jackson and his friends," but unlikely to see much success given the clarity of the District's anti-discrimination law and the stated aim of the initiative.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.